Snark Labs
Peptide research for people who
actually read the studies.
Most peptide content online is written by people trying to sell you something, copied from forums, or both. This site is different. Every claim is tied to a source. Evidence tiers are stated upfront. When the data is weak, we say so.
What we actually are
A small, independent research site. No team of employees, no offices, no awards. Just someone who got tired of reading the same recycled misinformation and decided to write better content.
- 1
Science-first
Every post starts with the peer-reviewed literature — not Reddit threads, not vendor claims. Mechanisms are explained. Study quality is noted. Animal vs human data is always distinguished.
- 2
Honest about evidence gaps
Most peptides have limited or no human trial data. We say that clearly. An evidence tier is stated on every review so you know exactly what you are working with before you read further.
- 3
Affiliate-supported
This site earns commission from affiliate links to research peptide suppliers. That is disclosed on every relevant page. It does not change what we write — a weak-evidence peptide gets called weak-evidence regardless.
What we cover
Research peptides organised by application area.
BPC-157, TB-500, and related peptides studied for tissue healing, tendon repair, and gut protection.
Semax, Selank, Dihexa, PE-22-28, and others from the nootropic peptide literature.
Epithalon, GHK-Cu, MOTS-c, Thymalin — peptides studied for ageing, telomere biology, and mitochondrial function.
Contact
Get in touch
Follow and DM @snrklabs for questions, corrections, or content requests.
If you spot an error in the science, reach out. We will update the post and note the correction. Getting it right matters more than being right.